GPT-5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Choose two or three models. Copy the URL to share your selection.
| Comparison | GPT-5gpt-5 | Gemini 2.5 Progemini-2.5-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Chat | Chat |
| Best for | Chat, writing, coding and reasoning tasks | Complex reasoning, multi-step analysis and difficult coding |
| TokenRex price | $1.25 in / $10.00 out per 1M tokens | $1.25 in / $10.00 out per 1M tokens |
| Cached input / 1M tokens | $0.125 per 1M tokens | $0.125 per 1M tokens |
| Cache write / 1M tokens | No extra fee | No extra fee |
| Cached output | Not offered · standard output rate applies | Not offered · standard output rate applies |
| Market price | $1.25 in / $10.00 out per 1M tokens | $1.25 in / $10.00 out per 1M tokens |
| Context window (provider) | 400,000 tokens | Not applicable |
| Input token limit (provider) | Within the context window | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Maximum output | 128,000 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Knowledge cutoff | Sep 30, 2024 | January 2025 |
| Vendor input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Audio, Video |
| Vendor output modalities | Text | Text |
| TokenRex endpoints | POST /v1/chat/completions | POST /v1/chat/completions |
| TokenRex input | Text, Image/PDF content through the chat bridge | — |
| TokenRex output | Text | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
| Benchmark evidence | — | 6 source-linked results |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.3% Official Google-reported score at launch (Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental, Mar 2025); single-attempt/pass@1 methodology per Gemini technical report conventions. Published source text: GPQA Diamond | Reasoning | 85.3% | accuracy | Official | Mar 25, 2025 evals.report – Gemini 2.5 Pro benchmark scores (sourced from Google's official Mar 25, 2025 launch materials) |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 21.64% Official Google-reported score, no tools, Mar 2025 launch. Published source text: Humanity's Last Exam | Reasoning | 21.64% | accuracy | Official | Mar 25, 2025 evals.report – Gemini 2.5 Pro benchmark scores |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.6% Official Google-reported single-attempt agentic coding score, Mar 2025 launch. Published source text: SWE-bench Verified | Coding | 57.6% | % resolved | Official | Mar 25, 2025 evals.report – Gemini 2.5 Pro benchmark scores |
| AIME 2025 (OTIS Mock) | — | 84.2% Official Google-reported score, no tools, Mar 2025 launch. Published source text: AIME (OTIS Mock) | Reasoning | 84.2% | accuracy | Official | Mar 25, 2025 evals.report – Gemini 2.5 Pro benchmark scores |
| LMArena Elo | — | 1457elo Human-preference blind evaluation, LMArena leaderboard, Mar 2025. Published source text: LMArena | Chat preference | 1457 | source-defined rating | Official | Mar 25, 2025 evals.report – Gemini 2.5 Pro benchmark scores |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | — | 16index Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 (current composite methodology as re-scored on AA's exact-model page, default reasoning effort), not the original v1 score at launch. Published source text: Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 16 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Artificial Analysis – Gemini 2.5 Pro model page |
No overall score, winner or cost-versus-score frontier is calculated without comparable, attributable benchmark evidence. Different test configurations appear separately. Vendor capabilities are distinct from TokenRex API support.
— means no published value or no matching capability. Provider token limits are not tested gateway guarantees; TokenRex media controls and response formats are listed separately.
GPT-5
Sources and verification
Provider specifications describe the upstream model, not a guarantee of every feature through TokenRex. Prices come from the enabled catalog; benchmark results belong to the exact tested model.
- Provider model specifications
Vendor-reported
Last checked
Research notes (1)
- Published provider limits; maximum-capacity requests have not been independently exercised through TokenRex. Thinking-level variants use the same provider model; reasoning and answer tokens share the output budget.
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Sources and verification
Provider specifications describe the upstream model, not a guarantee of every feature through TokenRex. Prices come from the enabled catalog; benchmark results belong to the exact tested model.
- Provider model specifications
Vendor-reported
Last checked - evals.report – Gemini 2.5 Pro benchmark scores (sourced from Google's official Mar 25, 2025 launch materials)
Third-party report
Last checked - Artificial Analysis – Gemini 2.5 Pro model page
Third-party report
Last checked
Research notes (1)
- Published provider limits; maximum-capacity requests have not been independently exercised through TokenRex. Thinking-level variants use the same provider model; reasoning and answer tokens share the output budget.
Popular comparisons
- GPT-6 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6 Sol vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol
- GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Sonnet 5
- GPT-6 Astra vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5
- GPT-5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5
- GPT-5.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
- GPT-5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
- GPT-6 Luna vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- GPT-5 Mini vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
- GPT-5 Nano vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
- GPT-5.4 Mini vs Claude Haiku 4.5